Waste360 is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

NERC: MRFs See Increase in Residuals, Processing Costs

Article-NERC: MRFs See Increase in Residuals, Processing Costs

Peter Macdiarmid/Getty/Images NERC: MRFs See Increase in Residuals, Processing Costs
NERC’s third quarterly report reveals that increasing levels of contamination in the region’s recycling stream are leading to higher processing costs.

The Northeast Recycling Council (NERC) has published the third in a series of quarterly reports on the blended value of a ton of materials marketed at materials recovery facilities (MRFs) in its region. The latest report reveals increasing levels of contamination within the recycling stream, leading to higher processing costs for MRFs.

“One of the catalysts for doing this study originally was to try to show municipal residential recycling programs that it really does cost something to recycle,” explains Lynn Rubinstein, NERC executive director.

She adds that the point has been to highlight some of the anxieties that communities have had about MRFs pushing back and rejecting loads or charging contamination fees to meet more stringent bale specifications.

“It’s not just that China imposed these requirements,” she says. “It’s that any domestic market imposed stricter specifications as well, and that costs money.”

NERC’s latest report, “Blended Commodity Values in the Northeast—February 2020,” covers the period between October and December 2019. NERC supports recycling market development and opportunities for improvements in its 11-state region: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Vermont.

An additional MRF participated in this latest survey, bringing the number of participating MRFs from around the region to 15. The new addition is the first privately owned MRF data incorporated into the report.

The latest report reveals some interesting trends, according to NERC:

  • The cost to process 1 ton of material through a MRF jumped by 5 percent over the three quarters surveyed, increasing from $82 per ton from April through June to $87 per ton from October through December.
  • The value of 1 ton of material increased slightly between the second and third quarters of the reports, though it was still greater in the first quarter of reporting. From April through June of last year, the value ranged from $45.83 with residuals (or contamination) to $51.65 without residuals. The value fell in the July through September quarter to a range of $34.85 to $41.55 before increasing to a range of $34.92 to $42.41 in the quarter spanning October through December.
  • Nevertheless, NERC says there has been a decrease of 24 percent with residuals and 18 percent without residuals.

Indirectly, NERC was interested in seeing whether there was a noticeable improvement in the quality of what residents were putting in their recycling containers. Rubinstein says that wasn’t the case.

“If we look at the report we just published, we see that the weighted average percentage of a ton received is 14 percent. Whereas in the previous quarter, it was 12 percent. That, from my perspective, is a significant decline in quality,” she points out. “My simple reading of this is that we’re seeing more garbage than we received the previous quarter.”

The report also revealed that processing costs in the region are on the rise.

“To me, that was the most interesting. I felt it was a really big jump in the cost to process,” notes Rubinstein. “When you pair that with the approximately 2 percent increase in the amount of contamination in the ton, that makes total sense to me.”

Rubinstein fears that negative messaging about recycling in the mainstream media and the various signals that residents receive about recycling confuses and demoralizes people.

“I continue to hear professionals in the recycling community bemoan the various signals that the residential population receives about what is recyclable and in what way they need to prepare things for recycling. This ongoing variety in messaging confuses people and makes them believe there is no way to do the right thing. Or they are just tired of all the different information,” she says.

NERC’s survey will be repeated for the quarter spanning January through March, and NERC says it anticipates expanding the number of MRFs participating in the survey.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.