Stay in the Know - Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Join a network of more than 90,000 waste and recycling industry professionals. Get the latest news and insights straight to your inbox. Free.
February 3, 2014
A consent decree emerging from a lawsuit coal combustion products (CCP) companies and others filed against the EPA and delivered to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia set Dec. 19 as the date the EPA will act on its revision of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D regulations pertaining to coal combustion residuals.
Coal combustion products maker Headwaters Inc., South Jordan, Utah, applauded the event in a news release, saying it will provide regulatory certainty for coal ash as a nonhazardous material. “We are pleased that EPA is committing to finalize its proposed upgraded standards for coal ash disposal under Subtitle D, the non-hazardous waste section of RCRA,” said Kirk Benson, Headwaters chairman and CEO.
Headwaters sued the EPA in 2012 to force a deadline for completing coal ash disposal regulations that were initially proposed in 2010. The proposed regulations created regulatory uncertainty that has hampered the beneficial use of coal combustion products, the firm said. The district court agreed with Headwaters and ordered the EPA to propose a date by which it would finalize revised coal ash disposal rules.
In the consent decree the parties also agreed to not appeal the court’s order.
“We previously reported that EPA said that alignment of new CCP impoundment water standards with proposed CCP disposal rules ‘could provide strong support for a conclusion that regulation of coal combustion products under RCRA Subtitle D would be adequate.’ “ Benson said. “It now appears almost certain that EPA will move forward with Subtitle D nonhazardous waste regulations.”
It is possible that Congress could amend RCRA and require states to enforce federal Subtitle D nonhazardous waste standards for coal ash disposal under state-issued permits. These permits could improve the overall management of coal ash disposal if enacted, Headwaters said.
“In either the legislative or the regulatory approach, the prospect of an unwarranted and damaging ‘hazardous waste’ designation for disposed coal ash is eliminated and the regulatory uncertainty removed,” Benson said. “Regulatory certainty will help us grow the beneficial use of coal ash – safely keeping the material out of disposal facilities, creating economic and environmental value.”
News Editor, Waste360
Allan Gerlat joined the Waste360 staff in September 2011 as news editor. He was the editor of Waste & Recycling News for the first 16 years of its history, and under his guidance the publication won 27 national and regional awards.
Before Waste & Recycling News, Allan worked at another Crain Communications publication, Rubber & Plastics News, which covers rubber product manufacturing. He began with the publication as associate editor and eventually became managing editor, a position he held for nine years.
Allan is a graduate of Ohio University, where he earned a BS in journalism. He is based in Sagamore Hills, in northeast Ohio.
You May Also Like