Los Angeles Aims for Zero Waste with Collection Franchise Zones

Allan Gerlat, News Editor

November 16, 2012

2 Min Read
Los Angeles Aims for Zero Waste with Collection Franchise Zones

Los Angeles will be better positioned to get to zero waste with a commercial waste and recycling collection restructuring approved by city council, according to a leading proponent of the proposal.

The plan would establish 11 franchise zones of varying sizes with one hauler per zone, says Andrea Alarcon, president of the Los Angeles Board of Public Works, in an interview. The commercial sector and multifamily dwellings with five units or more will be affected. The public sector residential waste and recycling business is unaffected.

Alarcon says that with the current open market system the city isn’t able to regulate the business, push diversion targets and establish labor standards. Los Angeles currently is at a 72-percent diversion rate. “We believe this proposal will take us to finish line,” she says.

Alarcon says the Department of Public Works and the Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation now have 90 days to develop an implementation plan for council with the consideration of a variety of options. She says they may establish small zones for smaller haulers to participate in the program. Another proposal calls for a mandatory subcontracting minimum in each zone that could have a smaller hauler working in concert with a large one.

Once that plan is adopted, Alarcon says three things need to happen: officials develop an environmental impact report (EIR); the city drops the existing ordinance; and the public works department develops and issues a request for proposals (RFP).

Opposition for the proposal has come from various sources, including Los Angeles-based lobbying firm Cerrell Associates, representing haulers, and the Chamber of Commerce.

Alarcon says fears are that rates will skyrocket under an exclusive system and that it is anticompetitive.  She says the city did an independent study that determined that the comparative rates for basic service was similar; it was only the addition of more aggressive goals and pricing that raised the rates.

She disagrees that the proposal is anti-competitive. “What they’re competing for is extraordinarily valuable,” she says. “That will drive them to put the most competitive bid forward to get it.”


About the Author(s)

Allan Gerlat

News Editor, Waste360

Allan Gerlat joined the Waste360 staff in September 2011 as news editor. He was the editor of Waste & Recycling News for the first 16 years of its history, and under his guidance the publication won 27 national and regional awards.

Before Waste & Recycling News, Allan worked at another Crain Communications publication, Rubber & Plastics News, which covers rubber product manufacturing. He began with the publication as associate editor and eventually became managing editor, a position he held for nine years.

Allan is a graduate of Ohio University, where he earned a BS in journalism. He is based in Sagamore Hills, in northeast Ohio.

Stay in the Know - Subscribe to Our Newsletters
Join a network of more than 90,000 waste and recycling industry professionals. Get the latest news and insights straight to your inbox. Free.

You May Also Like