Resource Recovery Systems and FCR (ReCommunity) filed a complaint in federal court yesterday against the City of Ann Arbor, Mich., for damages arising from the city’s termination of its recycling contract with ReCommunity.

According to a press release, “The filing includes claims that the City breached its contract, broke promises relied upon by ReCommunity and unjustly enriched themselves at ReCommunity’s expense through wrongful actions to escape a contract they believed was no longer financially advantageous.  Additionally, the City’s actions put dozens of employees out of work, created additional burdens for city taxpayers, and ended a vital, popular service for its residents.”

As of Wednesday afternoon, Ann Arbor City Attorney Stephen Postema told Mlive.com that he hadn't seen the complaint and had no comment.

ReCommunity has had a contract with Ann Arbor to manage the city’s recycling facility and transfer station since 1993. Those services included the sale of recyclables and sharing the profits from such sales when the revenues exceeded operating costs. The contract included a requirement that the city pay ReCommunity when sale revenues fell short of the amount of ReCommunity’s cost to operate the site. It also included a requirement for the city to reimburse ReCommunity’s costs for the repair and replacement of recycling equipment. ReCommunity said the city knew the fund was “insufficient to cover costs of needed repairs.”

ReCommunity said Ann Arbor “maximized their profits when market prices were up, receiving nearly $3 million since 2011, and then refused to pay required shortfall payments and invest in critical equipment when the market was down.”

ReCommunity said that when Ann Arbor’s city council members realized that its costs were expect to rise by $1 million that it began to engage in efforts to get out of its contract with ReCommunity and enter a new one with more favorable terms.

“To effect its plan, the City retained a consultant to develop a new contract, continued to default on its payment obligations, refused to invest in critical equipment and initiated a series of inspections designed to find any and all discrepancies to manufacture a basis for terminating the contract,” according to ReCommunity’s statement.

ReCommunity said because the city fell short in its repair fund, the company was forced to spend over $500,000 in repairs.
Then, earlier this month, the city council terminated the contract, citing “safety deficiencies in ReCommunity's operations of the facilities, including fires since the beginning of the year and operating practices that have jeopardized employees' safety.”

Further, the statement said: